Fort Seybert

frontier-fortfrench-and-indian-warcolonial-historywest-virginiapendleton-countyshawnee-history
5 min read

On the foggy morning of April 28, 1758, a Shawnee and Lenape war party arrived at Fort Seybert, a small stockade on the South Fork of the South Branch Potomac River in what is now Pendleton County, West Virginia. Most of the fort's men were away across Shenandoah Mountain on business. Only three adult males remained inside - including Captain Jacob Seybert - to defend the position. Ammunition was low. Seeing the situation as hopeless, Seybert surrendered on the war chief Bemino's promise that the captives' lives would be spared. The promise was not kept. Between 17 and 19 of the settlers were killed. Eleven were taken captive, including Seybert's teenage son, who survived to return to the region years later and provide an account of what happened.

Forts on the Frontier

Fort Seybert was one of dozens of small frontier forts thrown up by colonists and the Virginia Regiment during the French and Indian War. After General Edward Braddock's defeat at the Battle of the Monongahela on July 9, 1755, the western Virginia frontier was largely unprotected. Shawnee and Lenape (Delaware) war parties raided into the South Branch and South Fork valleys regularly. George Washington, then a 24-year-old colonel commanding the Virginia Regiment, oversaw a building program for frontier defense. Fort Seybert was constructed near John Patton's Mill, on land Patton had owned since 1747 and sold to Jacob Seybert in 1755. Washington favored fewer, stronger garrisons, but the Virginia Assembly ordered a chain of 23 small forts along the frontier. Fort Seybert was one of them.

What the Fort Looked Like

The De Hass image - an 1851 wood engraving widely reproduced - shows Fort Seybert as a large square stockade enclosing nearly a dozen log buildings. Local residents in the 1930s, interviewed by historian Mary Lee Keister Talbot, considered the De Hass picture impossible. Their own accounts, handed down across generations, described a circular stockade about 30 yards in diameter, with logs set on end in the ground reaching about 12 feet high, a single puncheon door, and a single two-story blockhouse 21 feet square inside the wall. From the blockhouse's upper loopholes, the open ground around the fort could be swept by rifle fire. People in the 1930s said they could still trace depressions in the ground where the palisade timbers had been set. The smaller fort - simpler, more defensible by a handful of men - matches what would have been built quickly by frontier families with limited resources.

Bemino's Raid

The party that attacked Fort Seybert and the nearby Fort Upper Tract was almost certainly part of a force of more than 100 Shawnee and Lenape warriors that Lieutenant Christopher Gist's scouts had spotted approaching the frontier in early April 1758. Gist himself had been incapacitated by a fall before he could send full warning. The war chief Bemino - known to colonists as John Killbuck - led the attack on Fort Seybert. Fort Upper Tract had been overrun and burned the previous day, with a similar number of settlers killed. The pattern at both forts was the same: arrive at first light, force a surrender, and then violate the surrender terms. Seybert's son later described how 'they bound ten, whom they conveyed without the fort, and then proceeded to massacre the others in the following manner: they seated them in a row upon a log, with an Indian standing behind each; and at a given signal, each Indian sunk his tomahawk into the head of his victim.'

Washington's Letter

On May 4, six days after the raid, George Washington wrote to John Blair, then acting Governor of Virginia, from Fort Loudoun in present-day Winchester. 'The enclosed letter from Capt. Waggener will inform your Honor of a very unfortunate affair,' Washington wrote. 'From the best accounts I have yet been able to get there are about 60 persons killed and missing.' He had sent a detachment of the regiment and allied Indian scouts to try to intercept the retreating war party. They did not catch them. The Shawnee and Lenape warriors withdrew west along what came to be known as the Shawnee Trail, taking the eleven Fort Seybert captives and what loot they had gathered back to the Ohio Country. Some of the captives, including Seybert's son, eventually returned. Others never did.

What the Land Remembers

Nothing of the original fort survives above ground. The community in the area is still called Fort Seybert. The depression in the soil where the palisade once stood has gradually filled in over the centuries. The deeper history - of the Shawnee and Lenape who used these mountains as hunting and movement corridors long before Patton or Seybert arrived, of the colonial pressure that pushed those communities into raids in defense of their own land claims, and of the settlers who came knowing the risks - is harder to mark with a single monument. The 17 to 19 people killed at Fort Seybert were real settlers with names and families. So were the eleven captives. So were the Shawnee and Lenape warriors who were defending land they understood to be theirs. The site is quiet now. The river still runs.

From the Air

Located at 38.70 degrees north, 79.19 degrees west, in Pendleton County, West Virginia, about eight miles northeast of Franklin. Best viewed from 3,000 to 4,500 feet AGL. The site sits along the South Fork of the South Branch Potomac River - look for the river course through the Allegheny ridges. The community of Fort Seybert is still on local maps. Nearest airports are Grant County (KW99), Elkins-Randolph County (KEKN), and Shenandoah Valley Regional (KSHD). The South Fork valley is a narrow corridor flanked by steep ridges.

Nearby Stories